Should I run a pitch or can I award the work directly?

Short answer. Pitch if you do not know the market, or if the assignment is big enough to justify weeks of work by three teams. If you already know the candidate and the amount is modest, a paid trial assignment is fairer and faster.

A pitch is expensive for everyone, you included. It is worth it when you do not know the market, or when the assignment is big enough to justify weeks of work by three teams. In every other case there are cheaper ways to reach the same choice.

When to pitch

When not to pitch

The three alternatives

The paid trial assignment. Give one agency a small, real project with a real deadline and a real invoice. You learn more about working together in three weeks of work than in three presentations, at a fraction of the cost of a pitch.

The chemistry round without work. Three meetings of an hour and a half, with the same questions. Enough to choose when you are mainly looking for a partner rather than a concept.

Awarding directly, well prepared. Entirely legitimate, provided you check the figures and references as thoroughly as in a pitch. See how to know whether an agency is financially healthy.

What not to do under any circumstances

Launch a pitch to put pressure on your existing agency. It works once, it costs you the people you liked most, and the rest of the market hears about it.

If you are torn between the two, that is exactly the question a selection process at IKAg starts with: see Agency selection & pitches.

See also: how many agencies to invite and what a pitch costs you internally.

Related questions

Is your question missing?

IKAg guides advertisers through agency selection, pitches, remuneration models and evaluation. Asking costs nothing and usually gets an answer within the day.

Ask IKAg your question Agency selection & pitches All questions