How big is Eyes-Screen?

Around 4 full-time equivalents (financial year 2025).

Review: Eyes-Screen

Q: What is Eyes-Screen specialised in?

Content strategy & editorial, Copywriting & long-form content, Video production.

Q: Who are the clients of Eyes-Screen?

Among others KMSKA, Kunstenpunt, hub.brussels, Museum of Fine Arts Ghent, POLITICO, VRT, FOMU - Fotomuseum Antwerpen, KANAL–Centre Pompidou, Confederatie Bouw, Sanofi, EUROPALIA Arts Festival, Belgian National Orchestra, Casco Phil, Brussels Studies Institute, Test Aankoop.

Who do they see as competitors?

Het Peloton MediaMixer

As indicated by the agency itself.

1

How this agency makes money

Revenue, margin and what an hour of work brings in. Everything on the earning side sits together here.

Revenue trendgross margin per financial year

20212022202320242025

Latest year: € 245.978 gross margin, growth -8,4% against a sector median of +11,2%.

Shrinking

MarginEBITDA / gross margin · value-added coverage

20212022202320242025

Eyes-ScreenSector median

EBITDA margin -3%, sector median 41,6%. Value-added coverage 0,97 (median 1,44). Value-added coverage sits in the sector-wide grey zone (0.95-1.15): context, not an alarm.

Loss-making

Revenue per headGross margin per FTE, against payroll cost

€ 57.204

Median (2024) € 70.773

Against a payroll cost of € 58.782 per FTE. The ratio between the two is the coverage rate above.

Below the median

Yield levelYield per hour worked, against payroll cost

€ 33

Median (2024) € 43

7.354 hours worked, 1.710 per FTE. Against that sits € 34 of payroll cost per hour worked, leaving € -1 for premises, equipment, depreciation and profit.

Below the median

No hourly rate follows from this. Gross margin is already net of services and sundry goods, which mixes rebilled production with the agency's own overhead, and the accounts do not say how many hours were billable. Deriving a rate from this systematically understates it.

2

Can the agency take a hit

Buffer, cash position and payment behaviour side by side, so you can see where they disagree.

Bufferequity in months of payroll

Buffer: 5,3 months (median 9,2 mo). Equity in the latest year: € 111.457.

Adequate buffer

Cash positionAvailable cash, and whether it covers short-term debt

Cash € 42.910. Liquidity ratio 1,47: current assets cover short-term debt in full. Solvency 41,9%.

Amply covered

Payment behaviourTowards suppliers and towards the NBB

Trade payables correspond to 77 days of supplier credit, sector median 43. The accounts were filed 173 days after closing; the legal deadline is seven months.

Pays slower than average

3

Signals and strengths

Events from the CBE and the Official Gazette over the past 24 months, plus positive markers derived from the figures.

Continuity

Points to ask about

Signals in the last 24 months

Sharp drop in equity · 31 Dec 2025 · NBB
The financial reserve shrank by more than 30% over two financial years. A dividend, buying out a partner and a loss-making year all look the same here. Ask which of the three it was.
Loss-making year · 31 Dec 2025 · NBB
One financial year closed at a loss. The size is not shown here: it can be a few thousand euros, a one-off settlement, or a deliberate investment. Ask the agency what was behind it.

Click a signal for a plain-language explanation. Each signal is a fact from a public source, without the agency's own context. Best to ask them directly.

What this agency does well

Healthy working capital (current ratio 1,47)
Equity was earned, not injected (reserves 4,7× the capital contributed)
Comfortable cash position: 62 days of payroll

Each point is a fact from the filed annual accounts, measured against the same thresholds and sector medians as the signals above.

4

All the figures

Reference material, not a starting point. Expand it if you want to read the series yourself.

5 financial years, 2021 to 2025Result, staff and balance sheet

	2021	2022	2023	2024	2025
Result
Gross margin	€ 158.722	€ 184.519+16,3%	€ 227.414+23,2%	€ 268.623+18,1%	€ 245.978-8,4%
EBITDA	€ 28.041	€ 48.329	€ 50.751	€ 20.996	€ -7.327
EBITDA margin	17,7%	26,2%	22,3%	7,8%	-3%
Staff
FTE	3,2	3,1-3,1%	4,1+32,3%	5,0+22%	4,3-14%
Gross margin per FTE	€ 49.601	€ 59.522	€ 55.467	€ 53.725	€ 57.204
Payroll cost per FTE	€ 40.537	€ 42.508	€ 42.680	€ 49.433	€ 58.782
Balance sheet
Equity	€ 148.783	€ 173.103	€ 165.197	€ 169.777	€ 111.457
Cash	€ 50.796	€ 69.807	€ 80.060	€ 45.686	€ 42.910
Liquidity ratio	3,21	1,92	1,70	1,87	1,47

Payroll cost per FTE comes from the social report where available, otherwise from the Remuneration line. Both are gross costs including employer contributions.

What this factsheet does not know

How good the work is. Figures do not measure creativity, strategy or chemistry.
How the client portfolio is spread. Concentration is not in the accounts.
Freelancers and subcontractors are not in the FTE figures. An agency with 40 staff may in practice run with 70 people.
The figures cover financial year 2025, filed on 22/06/2026. At a fast-moving agency reality today may differ.

Based on publicly filed annual accounts (NBB) and official records (CBE, Belgian Official Gazette). An indication, not financial advice. Sector medians calculated on 14 Sep 2026. Sector medians based on financial year 2024: the last year for which nearly all accounts have been filed.

What the agency actually does 3 services

Content & Production

Content strategy & editorial Copywriting & long-form content Video production

Sector focus

Media & entertainmentPublic sector & government

Publicly known clients

KMSKA, Kunstenpunt, hub.brussels, Museum of Fine Arts Ghent, POLITICO, VRT, FOMU - Fotomuseum Antwerpen, KANAL–Centre Pompidou, Confederatie Bouw, Sanofi, EUROPALIA Arts Festival, Belgian National Orchestra, Casco Phil, Brussels Studies Institute, Test Aankoop

Based on IKAg research and public sources. Incomplete or outdated? Let us know.

1

People 6 people mapped

We mapped 6 people, but this agency keeps job titles to itself — the team page sticks to names. Who does what is best asked over coffee.

A

Amandine

C

Cyril

G

Gilles

J

Jonas

L

Luca

R

Ruben

Based on public profiles. Something wrong? Let us know.

2

Seniors or juniors?

Payroll cost per FTE is the best public proxy for a team's experience level. Higher is not automatically better, but it says something about who sits at the table.

Payroll cost per FTE

€ 58.782

+16% versus the median

Team composition

4,3 FTE

28% women
72% men

€ 58.782

Median Productiehuis (2024) € 50.899All agencies (2024) € 59.069

Read with care. Directors and partners invoicing through a management company are not in the payroll cost. At small agencies this skews the picture downwards considerably.

3

Will your team stay?

Inflow and outflow from the social report. This series only counts people on the payroll: freelancers who invoice do not appear in it. A low figure therefore means two very different things, a stable permanent team or a small core with heavy outsourcing. A high figure usually points to short contracts. Compare only within the same type of agency.

Exits 2025

51,2%

Median for this type of agency (2024): 30,3%

Inflow 2025

23,3%

1,0 FTE in, 2,2 FTE out

Net team change

-1,2 FTE

20212022202320242025

Exits are clearly above what is usual for this type of agency. That may reflect project-based staffing, but it is a reason to ask in the pitch how much of the proposed team was already here two years ago, and to contractually fix your permanent contacts.

Source: annual accounts and social reports (NBB), collected by IKAg. Financial year 2025. Calculations by IKAg; an indication, not financial advice. Sector medians based on financial year 2024: the last year for which nearly all accounts have been filed.