Network agency or independent agency: what is the difference?

Short answer. A network agency hangs off an international holding and brings scale, process and international coverage; an independent decides for itself and has its owners in the building. Look at who signs, not at what is on the door.

A network agency hangs off an international holding, an independent belongs to its own people. You cannot see that difference at the door and usually not in the work either, but it decides who makes the calls, what happens when there is a problem, and how long your contact stays.

What a network agency gives you

What comes with it: decisions taken elsewhere. A local agency with an international owner carries targets it did not choose, and you notice that faster in a bad year than in a good one.

What an independent gives you

What you miss: scale, and sometimes a safety net. An independent of ten people that loses two key figures is a different agency.

The axis most often skipped

Two agencies competing in your pitch can hang off the same holding. That does not make their proposals worth less, but it makes your pitch less independent than it looks, and it is worth a conversation before you invite.

IKAg's factsheets show per agency which group it belongs to, with an overview by group. That is public and free to check.

What does not follow from this distinction

Quality. There is no measurement saying one type makes better work than the other. So use this to know who decides and what happens when something goes wrong, not to fill a longlist.

See also: which group an agency belongs to and big agency or small.

Related questions

Is your question missing?

IKAg guides advertisers through agency selection, pitches, remuneration models and evaluation. Asking costs nothing and usually gets an answer within the day.

Ask IKAg your question Agency ecosystem All questions